CovCare V6.0 / Enterprise reference
Leadership decision register
Fourteen discussion questions with options, ownership, dependencies and risks. No decision is recorded as approved.
Proposed design, not organizational approval or operational evidence. Public fictional demonstrations only; no sensitive information, live submissions or authority changes.
14 records · all proposed
DEC-001Executive sponsorship
- Id
- DEC-001
- Statement
- Who sponsors the initiative and owns executive escalation?
- Options
- Named accountable sponsor
- shared steering committee
- Benefits
- A sponsor clarifies escalation; a committee broadens review.
- Risks
- Ambiguous accountability or unsupported authority.
- Owner
- Executive leadership (proposed)
- Milestone Id
- MS-01
- Status
- Proposed — discussion required
- Date
- No verified organizational decision date.
- Dependencies
- Verified CHI decision authority
- Relevant program, privacy and finance evidence
- Requirement Ids
DEC-002Program ownership
- Id
- DEC-002
- Statement
- Which program role owns the youth-centered operating model?
- Options
- Central program owner
- delegated site program owners
- Benefits
- Clear federation standards versus local flexibility.
- Risks
- Youth priorities may be displaced by organizational workflow.
- Owner
- Program leadership (proposed)
- Milestone Id
- MS-02
- Status
- Proposed — discussion required
- Date
- No verified organizational decision date.
- Dependencies
- Verified CHI decision authority
- Relevant program, privacy and finance evidence
- Requirement Ids
DEC-003Pilot location
- Id
- DEC-003
- Statement
- What site and participant scope may enter a controlled pilot?
- Options
- Single reviewed site
- bounded multi-site pilot
- Benefits
- Small scope contains risk; multiple sites test coordination.
- Risks
- Premature exposure without classification and staffing readiness.
- Owner
- Executive and site leadership (proposed)
- Milestone Id
- MS-09
- Status
- Proposed — discussion required
- Date
- No verified organizational decision date.
- Dependencies
- Verified CHI decision authority
- Relevant program, privacy and finance evidence
- Requirement Ids
- REQ-UC-SITE-001
- REQ-UC-SITE-002
DEC-004Privacy and safeguarding model
- Id
- DEC-004
- Statement
- Which consent, confidentiality and escalation policies govern the pilot?
- Options
- Validate current policies
- define reviewed supplementary protocol
- Benefits
- Common standards and clear exceptions.
- Risks
- Unlawful sharing or misleading confidentiality promises.
- Owner
- Privacy and safeguarding leadership (proposed)
- Milestone Id
- MS-03
- Status
- Proposed — discussion required
- Date
- No verified organizational decision date.
- Dependencies
- Verified CHI decision authority
- Relevant program, privacy and finance evidence
- Requirement Ids
DEC-005Youth account approach
- Id
- DEC-005
- Statement
- What validated identity and recovery model is safe for youth?
- Options
- Retain reviewed private-ID design
- evaluate policy-approved alternatives
- Benefits
- Continuity without unnecessary legal-name collection.
- Risks
- Account lifecycle and recovery remain unverified.
- Owner
- Identity and youth program owners (proposed)
- Milestone Id
- MS-04
- Status
- Proposed — discussion required
- Date
- No verified organizational decision date.
- Dependencies
- Verified CHI decision authority
- Relevant program, privacy and finance evidence
- Requirement Ids
- REQ-UC-ANON-001
- REQ-UC-ANON-002
- REQ-UC-KIOSK-001
- REQ-UC-KIOSK-002
DEC-006Human support staffing
- Id
- DEC-006
- Statement
- Who provides triage, response, supervision and follow-up?
- Options
- Dedicated reviewed team
- supervised site-led model
- Benefits
- Clear ownership and coverage.
- Risks
- An attractive interface could imply unavailable staffing.
- Owner
- Central program leadership (proposed)
- Milestone Id
- MS-06
- Status
- Proposed — discussion required
- Date
- No verified organizational decision date.
- Dependencies
- Verified CHI decision authority
- Relevant program, privacy and finance evidence
- Requirement Ids
- REQ-UC-NAV-001
- REQ-UC-NAV-002
- REQ-UC-STAFF-001
- REQ-UC-STAFF-002
- REQ-UC-CLIN-001
- REQ-UC-CLIN-002
- REQ-UC-EDU-001
- REQ-UC-EDU-002
- REQ-UC-CAREER-001
- REQ-UC-CAREER-002
- REQ-UC-CENT-001
- REQ-UC-CENT-002
- REQ-UC-GOV-001
- REQ-UC-GOV-002
- REQ-UC-EXEC-001
- REQ-UC-EXEC-002
DEC-007Service partner governance
- Id
- DEC-007
- Statement
- How are partners vetted, renewed and limited to approved tasks?
- Options
- Central vetting with site assignments
- reviewed delegated vetting
- Benefits
- Consistent safeguards versus local service fit.
- Risks
- Membership or expired approval mistaken for current authority.
- Owner
- Partner and safeguarding owners (proposed)
- Milestone Id
- MS-07
- Status
- Proposed — discussion required
- Date
- No verified organizational decision date.
- Dependencies
- Verified CHI decision authority
- Relevant program, privacy and finance evidence
- Requirement Ids
- REQ-UC-PART-001
- REQ-UC-PART-002
DEC-008Impact Partners operating model
- Id
- DEC-008
- Statement
- How are projects, circles and contributions reviewed?
- Options
- Central review
- scoped delegated program review
- Benefits
- Inclusive participation with accountable decisions.
- Risks
- Offers mistaken for delivery or participation mistaken for access.
- Owner
- Development program leadership (proposed)
- Milestone Id
- MS-08
- Status
- Proposed — discussion required
- Date
- No verified organizational decision date.
- Dependencies
- Verified CHI decision authority
- Relevant program, privacy and finance evidence
- Requirement Ids
- REQ-UC-FIN-001
- REQ-UC-FIN-002
- REQ-UC-VOL-001
- REQ-UC-VOL-002
- REQ-UC-IMP-001
- REQ-UC-IMP-002
- REQ-UC-CORP-001
- REQ-UC-CORP-002
- REQ-UC-CIRCLE-001
- REQ-UC-CIRCLE-002
- REQ-UC-PROJ-001
- REQ-UC-PROJ-002
- REQ-UC-DON-001
- REQ-UC-DON-002
- REQ-UC-DEV-001
- REQ-UC-DEV-002
DEC-009Financial controls
- Id
- DEC-009
- Statement
- Which independent duties and evidence govern assistance and contributions?
- Options
- Existing validated controls
- reviewed additional controls
- Benefits
- Reconciliation and restricted purpose assurance.
- Risks
- Unilateral approval, misallocation or false receipts.
- Owner
- Finance control owner (proposed)
- Milestone Id
- MS-08
- Status
- Proposed — discussion required
- Date
- No verified organizational decision date.
- Dependencies
- Verified CHI decision authority
- Relevant program, privacy and finance evidence
- Requirement Ids
- REQ-UC-FIN-001
- REQ-UC-FIN-002
- REQ-UC-VOL-001
- REQ-UC-VOL-002
- REQ-UC-IMP-001
- REQ-UC-IMP-002
- REQ-UC-CORP-001
- REQ-UC-CORP-002
- REQ-UC-CIRCLE-001
- REQ-UC-CIRCLE-002
- REQ-UC-PROJ-001
- REQ-UC-PROJ-002
- REQ-UC-DON-001
- REQ-UC-DON-002
- REQ-UC-DEV-001
- REQ-UC-DEV-002
DEC-010Data retention
- Id
- DEC-010
- Statement
- What periods and deletion/appeal obligations apply to each data class?
- Options
- Policy-specific periods
- reviewed pilot minimization
- Benefits
- Reduced unnecessary retention and lawful evidence preservation.
- Risks
- Deleting required evidence or retaining youth information excessively.
- Owner
- Privacy and records owner (proposed)
- Milestone Id
- MS-03
- Status
- Proposed — discussion required
- Date
- No verified organizational decision date.
- Dependencies
- Verified CHI decision authority
- Relevant program, privacy and finance evidence
- Requirement Ids
DEC-011Reporting thresholds
- Id
- DEC-011
- Statement
- Which aggregation and suppression rules protect small groups?
- Options
- Policy-reviewed fixed thresholds
- risk-based combined controls
- Benefits
- Useful decision evidence without identification.
- Risks
- A demo threshold mistaken for proven de-identification.
- Owner
- Privacy and reporting owners (proposed)
- Milestone Id
- MS-09
- Status
- Proposed — discussion required
- Date
- No verified organizational decision date.
- Dependencies
- Verified CHI decision authority
- Relevant program, privacy and finance evidence
- Requirement Ids
- REQ-UC-SITE-001
- REQ-UC-SITE-002
DEC-012Integration priorities
- Id
- DEC-012
- Statement
- Which provider boundaries require reviewed integration first?
- Options
- Identity and consent first
- scope-approved coordination first
- Benefits
- Sequencing by risk and operational dependency.
- Risks
- Connecting providers before authorization and recovery readiness.
- Owner
- Technology and program owners (proposed)
- Milestone Id
- MS-06
- Status
- Proposed — discussion required
- Date
- No verified organizational decision date.
- Dependencies
- Verified CHI decision authority
- Relevant program, privacy and finance evidence
- Requirement Ids
- REQ-UC-NAV-001
- REQ-UC-NAV-002
- REQ-UC-STAFF-001
- REQ-UC-STAFF-002
- REQ-UC-CLIN-001
- REQ-UC-CLIN-002
- REQ-UC-EDU-001
- REQ-UC-EDU-002
- REQ-UC-CAREER-001
- REQ-UC-CAREER-002
- REQ-UC-CENT-001
- REQ-UC-CENT-002
- REQ-UC-GOV-001
- REQ-UC-GOV-002
- REQ-UC-EXEC-001
- REQ-UC-EXEC-002
DEC-013Funding
- Id
- DEC-013
- Statement
- What funding and staffing scope can leadership formally approve?
- Options
- Bounded discovery funding
- separately gated pilot funding
- Benefits
- Avoids pretending a concept has an operational budget.
- Risks
- Unsupported cost, fundraising or delivery promises.
- Owner
- Executive and finance leadership (proposed)
- Milestone Id
- MS-09
- Status
- Proposed — discussion required
- Date
- No verified organizational decision date.
- Dependencies
- Verified CHI decision authority
- Relevant program, privacy and finance evidence
- Requirement Ids
- REQ-UC-SITE-001
- REQ-UC-SITE-002
DEC-014Success criteria
- Id
- DEC-014
- Statement
- What evidence justifies continuing, changing or stopping the pilot?
- Options
- Joint youth/program measures
- independent evaluation design
- Benefits
- Agreed quality and safety gates before expansion.
- Risks
- Activity totals mistaken for attributable long-term impact.
- Owner
- Executive and evaluation owners (proposed)
- Milestone Id
- MS-10
- Status
- Proposed — discussion required
- Date
- No verified organizational decision date.
- Dependencies
- Verified CHI decision authority
- Relevant program, privacy and finance evidence
- Requirement Ids