Product roadmap and approval gates

Concept prototype. Do not submit sensitive information. Planned instructions describe intended design, not an activated service.

Content owner: Program content reviewer (proposed; CHI assignment pending)
Review: Source-reviewed documentation; organizational and professional validation pending.
History: V5.8: public reference foundation · V6.0: enterprise specifications and linked registers

Stages and dependencies

1. Executive concept review: Reviewed vision, use cases, decisions and feedback draft. Gate: No youth records or operational activation.
2. Organizational requirements validation: Reviewed specifications, stories, RACI and service blueprints. Gate: Approve lawful safeguarding, consent and professional boundaries.
3. Production baseline and data classification: Classification attestation, verified backups, recovery and rollback evidence. Gate: No migration without explicit object, grants/RLS and recovery review.
4. Identity and access remediation: Approved identity corrections and positive/negative lifecycle evidence. Gate: No automatic privileged bootstrap or staff youth-policy overrides.
5. Youth Journey persistence: Owner-scoped goals, consent projections and recovery tests. Gate: Owner-only access and consent withdrawal independently tested.
6. Governance and staff coordination: Reviewed triage, assignment, referrals, audit and escalation services. Gate: Trust scope, MFA, independent approvals and current assignment checks.
7. Service partner workflows: Scoped onboarding, task acceptance and independent verification. Gate: No interest-based access; current eligibility required at each handoff.
8. Impact Partners operationalization: Governed proposals, duties, commitments, receipts and verification. Gate: Finance separation, contributor privacy and no automatic youth access.
9. Controlled pilot: Formal pilot approval, monitored rollout, recovery and privacy-safe indicators. Gate: Separate deployment approval, rollback, scope and safety stop conditions.
10. Evaluation and phased expansion: Reviewed quality, safety, youth feedback and expansion decisions. Gate: No expansion without evidence and renewed scope approval.

Leadership decisions

Executive sponsorship
Program ownership
Pilot location
Privacy and safeguarding model
Youth account approach
Human support staffing
Service partner governance
Impact Partners operating model
Financial controls
Data retention
Reporting thresholds
Integration priorities
Funding
Success criteria

Current safe next step

Review the public prototype and proposed plan. Provide authorized evidence of classification, actual recovery readiness and CHI change authority without sharing private records or credentials in chat.

Not an activation plan approval

No dates, budgets, delivery promises or approved pilot locations are invented. A demo or documentation release does not authorize accounts, migrations, production tests, payments or publication.

Example dependency

A project marketplace could be visually complete while persistent project approval remains blocked by identity, permission, finance, safeguarding, audit and backup requirements.