CovCare V6.0 — Address a Site Resource or Capacity Gap

Proposed design, not organizational approval or operational evidence. Public fictional demonstrations only; no sensitive information, live submissions or authority changes.

UC-SITE-002 · V6.0 · Proposed

Address a Site Resource or Capacity Gap

Role tour ↗Module guide ↗Stories & tests ↗Traceability ↗

UC-SITE-002

Version

6.0

Status

Proposed

Priority

Medium

Role Id

site-leadership

Primary Actor

Site Leadership

Module Id

sites

Capability Id

CAP-INT

Objective Id

OBJ-07

Owner

Executive reporting owner (proposed)

Boundary

Public documentation and fictional practice now; separately reviewed sites operational boundary in future.

Goal

Address a Site Resource or Capacity Gap while maintaining choice, purpose limitation and accountable human review.

Value

Define evidence before claiming improvement.

Trigger

Identify a site resource or staffing gap.

Scope

The stated participant task only; no unrelated records, new authority or automatic operational activation.

Assumptions

Covenant House validates program fit, ownership and relevant policies.
Required provider, staffing and data-quality evidence is established before operation.

Supporting Actors

Executive reporting owner
Independent reviewer
Governance and safeguarding reviewer

Preconditions

Verified provisioned identity, current MFA, organization/site/project and assignment scope.
Current voluntary consent for the selected goal; private reflections excluded.
Required organizational and human approval for operational behavior; absent in this public specification.
Operational services, recovery readiness and separately approved testing remain dependencies.

Alternatives

Id
UC-SITE-002-ALT-01
At
3
Condition
The participant chooses a different suitable option.
Path
Return to validate current program capacity, check scope and consent again, and document the revised purpose; do not duplicate evidence.
Id
UC-SITE-002-ALT-02
At
6
Condition
An eligible alternative channel or resource is reviewed.
Path
Reassess the sites provider and required human approval; continue only with minimum authorized information. Public exploration may continue without an account.

Exceptions

Id
UC-SITE-002-EX-01
Condition
Authorization denied, expired or revoked.
Response
Stop the restricted step and provide no record readback; review access through qualified authority, never public self-selection.
Id
UC-SITE-002-EX-02
Condition
Missing information, conflicting evidence or unavailable service.
Response
Hold the relevant state for human review. Do not fabricate capacity, receipt, attendance, outcomes or successful submission.
Id
UC-SITE-002-EX-03
Condition
Consent withdrawn or a safeguarding issue raised.
Response
Stop optional disclosure; qualified humans apply the reviewed lawful safeguarding policy. The prototype sends no escalation.

Postconditions

Success: Define evidence before claiming improvement.
Failure: No unauthorized disclosure, authority grant or claimed fulfillment; public practice remains temporary and operational tasks remain blocked.

Rule Ids

Data

Field
Selected goal and approved barrier
Validation
Nonempty relevant reference; no unrelated personal history.
Owner
Young person
Sensitivity
Restricted in future operation; fictional only in public practice.
Sharing
Explicit purpose and authorized recipient only; never private reflections.
Audit
Future scoped actor, decision, purpose and evidence reference; do not log secrets.
Retention
Organizational retention and deletion period not approved.
Consent
Current explicit youth consent where selected goal context is involved; otherwise lawful task-specific processing basis requires policy review. No blanket consent assumed.
Field
Decision or verification evidence reference
Validation
Provenance, authorized reviewer and current scope; missing evidence remains unverified.
Owner
Executive reporting owner
Sensitivity
Restricted operational evidence; none read by the catalog.
Sharing
Authorized reviewer only; aggregate public explanation has no personal identifiers.
Audit
Future atomic decision and change audit where operational approval is required.
Retention
Policy-specific review and appeal requirements unresolved.
Consent
Purpose-limited review under approved evidence policy; contributor recognition requires a separate optional choice.

Nfr

Id
NFR-SEC
Requirement
Deny unauthorized access server-side; never widen youth owner-only policies.
Id
NFR-PRIV
Requirement
Minimize information, separate private reflections and constrain recipient purpose.
Id
NFR-A11Y
Requirement
Target WCAG 2.2 AA, labeled keyboard/touch controls; professional review outstanding.
Id
NFR-LOC
Requirement
Five youth languages; executive English and machine-assisted translations require review.
Id
NFR-REL
Requirement
Failure must not confirm a write or restore expired local content; operational reliability and availability targets unapproved.
Id
NFR-PERF
Requirement
Measure agreed task response and availability targets during an approved pilot; no unapproved SLA.

Dependencies

Verified CHI ownership and safeguarding/privacy review
Data classification, backup and tested recovery evidence
Approved sites service and scoped operational test plan
Related module: sites; proposed business owner: Executive reporting owner (proposed)

Milestone Id

MS-09

Assessment

Proposed: All formal operational sequences are proposed, not organizationally approved.
Frontend: Existing public sites views and tours explain the concept only.
Backend: No new operational behavior is verified by this catalog.
Simulated: Fictional local practice and storyboard navigation never confer authority.
Blocked: Account activation, staff coordination, payments and assignments need separate approvals.
Unknown: Positive authenticated lifecycle, provider delivery and cross-account privacy remain unverified.

System Boundary

Public documentation and fictional practice now; separately reviewed sites operational boundary in future.

Strategic Alignment

Objective Id: OBJ-07
Statement: Proposed youth-centered planning and accountable coordination; formal CHI alignment is not established.

Main success scenario · proposed

1. Confirm purpose-limited entry for Address a Site Resource or Capacity Gap
Number
1
Actor
Site Leadership
Action
Confirm purpose-limited entry for Address a Site Resource or Capacity Gap
Response
Check the task-specific identity, organizational/site/project scope and relevant assigned permission before restricted information is shown. Public storyboard remains read-only.
Validation
Verified provisioned identity, current MFA, organization/site/project and assignment scope.
Information
Verified scope references only; no restricted record returned by this public catalog.
State
UC-SITE-002-ENTRY: scope review required
Responsibility
Site Leadership
Authorization Boundary
Verified provisioned identity, current MFA, organization/site/project and assignment scope.
Next State
UC-SITE-002-S01: identify a site resource or staffing gap reviewed
2. Identify a site resource or staffing gap.
Number
2
Actor
Site Leadership
Action
Identify a site resource or staffing gap.
Response
Describe the gap without youth identifiers.
Validation
Before 'Identify a site resource or staffing gap.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Information
Task-specific selected goal and approved barrier for this decision: Identify a site resource or staffing gap. Only necessary context; private reflections and unrelated identities excluded.
State
UC-SITE-002-S01: identify a site resource or staffing gap reviewed
Responsibility
Site Leadership
Authorization Boundary
Before 'Identify a site resource or staffing gap.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Next State
UC-SITE-002-S02: validate current program capacity reviewed
3. Validate current program capacity.
Number
3
Actor
Site Leadership
Action
Validate current program capacity.
Response
Reject fictional availability as operating evidence.
Validation
Before 'Validate current program capacity.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Information
Task-specific selected goal and approved barrier for this decision: Validate current program capacity. Only necessary context; private reflections and unrelated identities excluded.
State
UC-SITE-002-S02: validate current program capacity reviewed
Responsibility
Site Leadership
Authorization Boundary
Before 'Validate current program capacity.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Next State
UC-SITE-002-S03: check constraints and safeguarding needs reviewed
4. Check constraints and safeguarding needs.
Number
4
Actor
Site Leadership
Action
Check constraints and safeguarding needs.
Response
Identify service, staffing and finance dependencies.
Validation
Before 'Check constraints and safeguarding needs.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Information
Task-specific selected goal and approved barrier for this decision: Check constraints and safeguarding needs. Only necessary context; private reflections and unrelated identities excluded.
State
UC-SITE-002-S03: check constraints and safeguarding needs reviewed
Responsibility
Site Leadership
Authorization Boundary
Before 'Check constraints and safeguarding needs.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Next State
UC-SITE-002-S04: compare redistribution and new-capacity options reviewed
5. Compare redistribution and new-capacity options.
Number
5
Actor
Site Leadership
Action
Compare redistribution and new-capacity options.
Response
Document tradeoffs without invented budgets.
Validation
Before 'Compare redistribution and new-capacity options.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Information
Task-specific selected goal and approved barrier for this decision: Compare redistribution and new-capacity options. Only necessary context; private reflections and unrelated identities excluded.
State
UC-SITE-002-S04: compare redistribution and new-capacity options reviewed
Responsibility
Site Leadership
Authorization Boundary
Before 'Compare redistribution and new-capacity options.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Next State
UC-SITE-002-S05: consult central and relevant program owners reviewed
6. Consult Central and relevant program owners.
Number
6
Actor
Site Leadership
Action
Consult Central and relevant program owners.
Response
Limit context to the program need.
Validation
Before 'Consult Central and relevant program owners.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Information
Task-specific selected goal and approved barrier for this decision: Consult Central and relevant program owners. Only necessary context; private reflections and unrelated identities excluded.
State
UC-SITE-002-S05: consult central and relevant program owners reviewed
Responsibility
Site Leadership
Authorization Boundary
Before 'Consult Central and relevant program owners.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Next State
UC-SITE-002-S06: prepare a resourcing recommendation reviewed
7. Prepare a resourcing recommendation.
Number
7
Actor
Site Leadership
Action
Prepare a resourcing recommendation.
Response
Name a proposed decision owner and scope.
Validation
Before 'Prepare a resourcing recommendation.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Information
Task-specific selected goal and approved barrier for this decision: Prepare a resourcing recommendation. Only necessary context; private reflections and unrelated identities excluded.
State
UC-SITE-002-S06: prepare a resourcing recommendation reviewed
Responsibility
Site Leadership
Authorization Boundary
Before 'Prepare a resourcing recommendation.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Next State
UC-SITE-002-S07: seek required budget and staffing decisions reviewed
8. Seek required budget and staffing decisions.
Number
8
Actor
Site Leadership
Action
Seek required budget and staffing decisions.
Response
Keep recommendation distinct from approval.
Validation
Before 'Seek required budget and staffing decisions.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Information
Task-specific selected goal and approved barrier for this decision: Seek required budget and staffing decisions. Only necessary context; private reflections and unrelated identities excluded.
State
UC-SITE-002-S07: seek required budget and staffing decisions reviewed
Responsibility
Site Leadership
Authorization Boundary
Before 'Seek required budget and staffing decisions.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Next State
UC-SITE-002-S08: review a future evaluation approach reviewed
9. Review a future evaluation approach.
Number
9
Actor
Site Leadership
Action
Review a future evaluation approach.
Response
Define evidence before claiming improvement.
Validation
Before 'Review a future evaluation approach.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Information
Task-specific selected goal and approved barrier for this decision: Review a future evaluation approach. Only necessary context; private reflections and unrelated identities excluded.
State
UC-SITE-002-S08: review a future evaluation approach reviewed
Responsibility
Site Leadership
Authorization Boundary
Before 'Review a future evaluation approach.', validate the stated task scope, selected goal and approved barrier and the current authorized reviewer and assignment. Missing evidence pauses this step; the public catalog performs no operation.
Next State
UC-SITE-002-REVIEW: outcome remains proposed until approved operational evidence exists
10. Review the final evidence and continuing eligibility for Address a Site Resource or Capacity Gap
Number
10
Actor
Executive reporting owner (proposed)
Action
Review the final evidence and continuing eligibility for Address a Site Resource or Capacity Gap
Response
Separate the proposed outcome from verified delivery; preserve only permitted review evidence and apply policy-approved retention or revocation. No public record mutation.
Validation
Qualified independent review where required, current authority and approved evidence/retention policy.
Information
Minimum outcome and reviewer reference; no private reflections or public identities.
State
UC-SITE-002-REVIEW: outcome remains proposed until approved operational evidence exists
Responsibility
Executive reporting owner (proposed)
Authorization Boundary
Qualified independent review where required, current authority and approved evidence/retention policy.
Next State
Proposed final review; no operational mutation.

Linked user story and acceptance criteria

US-UC-SITE-002

Parent Id

UC-SITE-002

Persona

Site Leadership

Statement

As a Site Leadership, I want to address a Site Resource or Capacity Gap, so that I can pursue this outcome: define evidence before claiming improvement.

Value

Define evidence before claiming improvement.

Priority

Medium

Status

Proposed

Criteria

Id
AC-UC-SITE-002-01
Kind
Success
Given
Verified provisioned identity, current MFA, organization/site/project and assignment scope. The task is Address a Site Resource or Capacity Gap.
When
Review the final evidence and continuing eligibility for Address a Site Resource or Capacity Gap
Then
Separate the proposed outcome from verified delivery; preserve only permitted review evidence and apply policy-approved retention or revocation. No public record mutation. No operational success is inferred from documentation.
Id
AC-UC-SITE-002-02
Kind
Denied
Given
missing, revoked or unrelated authorization
When
the participant attempts the restricted action
Then
The action is denied without revealing restricted data or creating a record.
Id
AC-UC-SITE-002-03
Kind
Invalid input
Given
The Selected goal and approved barrier needed for Address a Site Resource or Capacity Gap is missing or contradictory.
When
Validate current program capacity.
Then
Hold the affected step; require Nonempty relevant reference; no unrelated personal history. before further review. Do not claim a successful outcome.
Id
AC-UC-SITE-002-04
Kind
Privacy
Given
private reflections, unrelated youth information or contributor identities outside the approved purpose
When
a summary is prepared for site leadership
Then
Those fields are excluded; only purpose-limited authorized context may be shared.
Id
AC-UC-SITE-002-05
Kind
Exception
Given
withdrawn consent, an unavailable provider, conflicting evidence or a safeguarding concern relevant to this task
When
the sequence reaches the affected handoff
Then
The handoff pauses; an appropriate qualified human reviews the next step and no delivery, payment or approval is falsely confirmed.

Test Ids

Business rules

BR-MIN · Minimum necessary information

Share only the task-relevant approved context. Private reflections never enter public staff demonstrations.

BR-TRUTH · Evidence before claims

A referral is not delivery; documentation and storyboard completion are not verification or approval.

BR-CONSENT · Youth choice and selected sharing

Only an explicitly selected goal projection may be shared; youth control approval and goal completion. Withdrawal stops optional disclosure.

BR-SCOPE · Current scoped authority

Verified identity, permission, organization/site/project and assignment scope are separate. Privileged access requires independent approvals, MFA and launch review; no public self-grant.

BR-HUMAN · Qualified human accountability

Qualified humans decide triage, clinical, safeguarding, assistance and operational approvals; the guide cannot make those decisions.

Address a Site Resource or Capacity Gap

Address a Site Resource or Capacity Gap

Main success scenario · proposed

Linked user story and acceptance criteria

Business rules

Explore the CovCare Vision