How project approval would work

Concept prototype. Do not submit sensitive information. Planned instructions describe intended design, not an activated service.

Content owner: Program content reviewer (proposed; CHI assignment pending)
Review: Source-reviewed documentation; organizational and professional validation pending.
History: V5.8: public reference foundation · V6.0: enterprise specifications and linked registers

From idea to reviewed project

Public proposals are temporary fictional practice. A submitted-simulation label is not an application or approval. No real project owner, spending authority or youth-facing assignment is created.

Proposed review sequence

Idea is proposed: Describe an appropriate purpose and contribution. Decision owner: Impact partner. Gate: Fictional practice today.
CHI reviews fit: Check program suitability and community benefit. Decision owner: CHI reviewer. Gate: Program approval.
Finance and safeguarding review: Check restrictions, risks and responsibilities. Decision owner: Finance / safeguarding reviewers. Gate: Independent relevant approvals.
Owner is assigned: Verify scoped responsibility. Decision owner: CHI authority. Gate: Trust assignment.
Project is approved: Define deliverables and evidence criteria. Decision owner: Program authority. Gate: Program and financial approval.
Contributions are coordinated: Keep pledges, hours and items separate. Decision owner: Project owner. Gate: Vetting and activity approval.
Milestones are verified: Require evidence rather than marking offers as delivered. Decision owner: Independent verifier. Gate: Verification.
Impact is reported: Use only authorized privacy-safe aggregates. Decision owner: Reporting steward. Gate: Privacy and reporting approval.

Fictional technology project

A supporter could propose equipment for a reviewed education activity. CHI would decide suitability, finance restrictions, safeguarding and ownership before offers were coordinated. A laptop offer is not delivered equipment.

Data and exceptions

Only a minimum necessary proposal and approved task evidence should be shared. Do not include a young person’s name, private Journey or clinical detail. If review fails, stop; the prototype sends no exception notification.

Current limitation

No backend project approval, persistent submission, assignment, payment or verified reporting service is activated. All operational steps require separately approved scoped implementation.